It's time to examine the idea that what is missing in leadership development is that many leaders (and their coaches, trainers and facilitators) don’t comprehend deeply enough the inherent assumptions of the approaches, frameworks and bodies of thought that drive their thoughts and actions. By gaining a deeper meaning, a more nuanced approach to leadership would be possible, characterised by a blend of scholarly insight that incorporates open systems thinking and practical wisdom.
Nothing is as practical as a good theory. The best way to understand something is to try and change it. Kurt Lewin (Greenwood and Levin, 1998, p.19)
Aberrant Meta-Framework
This series of upcoming newsletters embarks on a deep dive into the meta-framework concept—a universal guide that empowers leaders to navigate modern leadership's intricate, often chaotic landscape.
A robust meta-framework for contemporary leadership, it represents a way to make consistent progress towards understanding and addressing the multifaceted challenges of today's world. Focusing on the significance of context, the meta-framework equips leaders with the insights needed to make informed, ethical, and innovative decisions, fostering environments that are adaptable, inclusive, and conducive to sustainable success.
This first instalment examines the necessity of such a meta-framework, setting the stage for a comprehensive exploration of its components and applications.
Incorporating this meta-framework into leadership practices involves a commitment to ongoing learning and reflection, recognising the dynamic and complex nature of the environments in which leaders operate. It calls for an analytical and empathetic approach, combining a deep understanding of theoretical frameworks with a practical appreciation for the realities on the ground.
The Dual Perspectives of a Meta-Framework: Microscope and Telescope
The complexity of leadership challenges requires a dual-lens approach: the microscopic and the telescopic. The microscopic lens allows leaders to scrutinise the minutiae of their organisations—those rational, controllable elements where traditional problem-solving frameworks excel. Conversely, the telescopic lens offers a broad, expansive view of the organisation within its complex ecosystem, enabling leaders to anticipate and adapt to change more effectively.
The interplay between these perspectives is crucial and represents what has been lacking. While the microscopic view focuses on optimisation and control within defined boundaries, the telescopic view embraces the ambiguity and unpredictability of external forces. It's a dynamic balance that many organisations struggle to maintain, with leaders defaulting to the security of the reductionist microscope over the uncertainty of the unknown.
Kodak’s Strategic Myopia
The tale of Kodak’s decline from a photography giant to bankruptcy is a poignant illustration of the dangers inherent in a purely microscopic focus. Despite inventing the first digital camera, Kodak clung to its film-based business model, viewing the digital revolution through a reductionist lens. This myopic small view strategy led to a catastrophic underestimation of digital photography's disruptive potential. By ignoring the telescopic view, Kodak missed the opportunity to lead the digital transition, ultimately succumbing to competitors who embraced innovation and agility. Kodak's story underlines the importance of an expansive, adaptive framework that can simultaneously account for both detail and the big picture.
The Case for an Expansive Framework
Unlike traditional reductionist approaches that dissect systems into manageable parts, an expansive meta-framework also considers the interconnectivity and dynamic interplay within systems. It acknowledges that organisations operate in a complex web of cultural, environmental, and external influences, all of which demand a more nuanced, integrated approach to leadership and strategy.
Implementing such a framework requires a shift from linear thinking to embracing complexity, ambiguity, volatility, uncertainty, and diversity. It involves leveraging cross-disciplinary insights and valuing both qualitative and quantitative data. While including problem-solving for those problems that can be solved, the broader perspective of a meta-framework incorporates the challenges of complexity that need to be addressed for progress to be made. It prioritises innovation, flexibility, and continuous learning.
Metaphorical Insights: Microscope vs. Telescope
Drawing a metaphorical parallel, we can liken the reductionist framework to a microscope, zooming in on the details yet often missing the system's broader context.
In addition, an expansive meta-framework also provides a telescope, offering a wide-angle view of the organisation within its larger ecosystem, highlighting interdependencies and external forces at play.
This metaphor underscores the distinction between dissecting to optimise and zooming out to integrate and innovate. Each perspective offers valuable insights, but their combination equips leaders with the ability to take effective action to navigate the complexities of the modern business landscape effectively.
Conclusion and Next Steps
The imperative for a meta-framework that transcends traditional boundaries, offering a more adaptive, resilient approach to leadership is clear. Such a framework is crucial.
Look out for the next article in this series, where I will delve into the essential characteristics of the meta-framework and its practical application in cultivating leadership excellence in the face of complexity and change.
Schedule a free 30-minute exploratory discussion with Desley Lodwick here.
Consider resharing and following Dr. Desley Lodwick to see more content like this.
Comments